Hello, I am looking for someone to write an essay on The needs of future generations are being met by current policies of sustainable development. To what extent do you agree with this statement. It needs to be at least 1500 words.
It defines it as the development that satisfies the current human needs without reducing the availability of the resources to the future generations. It breaks it into two concepts. The first concept concentrates on the needs and in particular the needs of the poor. Its second approach is on limitations. Its approach on limitations focuses on social and technology factors, and their ability in ensuring that environment use meets the present and future generations wants (Dobson & Lucadrie 2002, p. 85). It further defines development that is sustainable as the progressive transformation of the society and economy (Dobson & Lucadrie 2002, p. 85). It is, therefore, vital to concentrate on the three pillars of sustainable development. social, political, and economic factors to ensure the continuity of future generations.
Researchers are of the opinion that governments still believe on the old development paradigms. They emphasize on economic growth while believing that other industrialized countries have made no changes to their patterns of production and consumption that threaten global resources. Meeting the goals of sustainable development require genuine institutional and political will by governments in all countries. The countries should contribute to it regardless of whether they are developed or not (Purvis & Grainger 2013, p. 177).
Weak law enforcement, corruption, and ineffective governments are obstacles in achieving sustainability. Limited policy capacity, lack of information, and incompetent decision makers are some of the reasons for the minimal cooperation by governments. The World Summit discussion on Sustainable Development held in 2002 in South Africa maintained that the sustainable development has not evolved out of its roots. Focusing the issue on an environmental direction rather than integrating with an all-round development perspective is a mistake. The political agenda replaces